|
Supreme Court to Take Jurisdiction of PECG's Furlough
Lawsuit |
|
June 9, 2010
When the Governor issued his
Executive Order in December 2008 mandating unpaid
furloughs for state employees, PECG immediately
filed a lawsuit in the Sacramento Superior Court.
Several other Unions subsequently filed challenges
in Sacramento or Bay Area courts.
The initial ruling by the Superior Court upheld the
Governor’s furlough order. PECG took the case to the
Court of Appeal, which reviews Superior Court
rulings.
Legal briefs or written arguments were filed by all
parties. The Court asked additional questions which
PECG and others responded to. Meanwhile, PECG
supported a motion by the Governor’s office asking
the State Supreme Court to take jurisdiction of the
matter, along with several other lawsuits
subsequently filed on the same subject. On April 22,
the Supreme Court declined the request.
Then, on June 9, while PECG was awaiting a date for
oral argument before the Court of Appeal, the
Supreme Court changed its mind. It took jurisdiction
of the PECG lawsuit as well as two other furlough
challenges, and announced it would review the matter
and issue a ruling. It also asked the parties to
respond to questions regarding the Government Code
section dealing with reduced work time and the
employee compensation item in the 2008-09 fiscal
year State Budget.
PECG and the other parties will respond in writing
by June 23 and can reply to the filings of others by
June 30. After that, the Supreme Court will schedule
a date for oral argument, after which it will rule
on the matter.
This is a positive step to expedite the processing
of this legal challenge. PECG previously requested
the Supreme Court to take jurisdiction because it
would expedite the appeal process by at least a year
and would eliminate the confusion of conflicting
Court of Appeal rulings which ultimately have to be
resolved by the State Supreme Court anyway. PECG is
the lead case and we look forward to arguing the
issues before the Supreme Court.
-----------------------------------------------
Meanwhile, the Court of Appeal has
set June 21 as the hearing date on the issue
regarding
whether the State Controller may issue full
paychecks, or must limit them to the minimum wage,
if the Legislature is late with a Budget again this
summer. The issue would be whether the July payroll
must be paid in full or if paychecks (except for
minimum wage) would be delayed until after the
Legislature adopts a budget for the fiscal year
beginning in July. The Governor raised the challenge
and PECG has joined with the Controller in arguing
that all employees must receive full paychecks on
time. Meanwhile, PECG is sponsoring legislation to
provide a continuous appropriation for on time
paychecks for PECG members and other state
employees, regardless of the timing of the passage
of the Budget. Both bills are awaiting action in the
State Senate.
|
|
|
|